Find the strongest path,
not just a connection.
LinkedIn shows you who’s connected. Slack shows you who responds. Graph.one shows you who actually knows someone – across your whole team’s network, ranked by evidence.
Stop guessing which intro will actually work.
‘50 mutual connections’ means nothing without evidence
A vanity metric. Still no signal about who can actually make the intro.
50 mutual connections analysed. Only one is a credible warm path.
One usable path, surfaced instantly, with the evidence to act on it.
Stop asking around in Slack
Does anyone know Lisa Park at NovaTech? Need an intro for the partnership deal.
I think we’re connected? Not sure we’ve ever talked though
Yeah I met her a couple years ago, we had coffee at a conference. Not sure if she’d remember me
4 hours later. Two vague replies. The best path never surfaced – Tom didn’t see the message, and nobody knew about his connection to NovaTech’s investor.
Dave Klein is a NovaTech board member. Tom has known him for 5 years – last meeting 2 weeks ago.
Met Lisa 2 years ago – 2 emails and 1 meeting. No contact in 23 months.
Connected, but no emails, no meetings. An intro would be cold.
Under 1 second. The strongest path was in Tom’s network – and he didn’t even know it.
Why this matters
Most connections are noise
The majority of mutual connections have no real relationship behind them. Graph.one filters signal from noise using actual interaction evidence – emails, meetings, recency.
The best path is often hidden
Your strongest route might run through a teammate’s contact that nobody thought to mention. Team-wide search surfaces paths that Slack threads and memory can’t.
Evidence, not guesswork
Every path comes with inspectable evidence – what interactions happened, how recently, and how strong each leg is. You know before you ask.